Category Archives: Working with mixed media

Research point: Pure watercolours vs mixed media

Think about the differences between using pure watercolour and mixed media. If you can, visit a gallery or galleries with both kinds of painting on show and make comparative notes on the differences between the two.

My own experiences during this project

From my own experiences, working purely with watercolour was very different from using mixed media. I had trouble integrating other media at first, because I did not want them to dominate the painting. With some practice, I began to welcome the additional possibilities and even felt that including other media helped to emphasize the particular character of watercolours. I think this was because opaque media like gouache and oil pastels emphasized the transparency and lightness of watercolours. I also enjoyed the contrast between the fine dark ink lines and textures versus the bright colours in the mixed media flower bouquet (second large study with dark background).

In a way, using mixed media is one solution to overcoming limitations of pure watercolour. For example if one wants to paint light colours agains a dark background, this can be achieved using opaque media. It relieves the necessity of meticulous planning of tonal areas and in my case, it helped me to produce more energetic and spontaneous paintings.

Starting from initial dislike and reservations against mixing watercolours with other media, the experience has changed my views. I highly appreciate this!

Looking at other artists

I did a Google search for artists who employ both pure watercolours and mixed media approaches, but did not get very far. There were a few contemporary artists and hobby painters, of which I chose three for a closer look. What I saw was quite in line with how I assessed what I produced in this part – additional media can add an element of interest, for example giving structure by adding linear marks over areas of colour. There’s always a risk of becoming too blunt or illustrative, but of course this is also a matter of taste. I saw quite energetic paintings but this may have been a selection bias and just be the result of what by chance turned up in my Google result list.

Karen Dawson (United states, contemporary)

Karen Dawson seems to always work in mixed media, I found no pure watercolours. I selected two paintings of a series in yellow oil pastel with watercolours.

Street game: This is a nice scene and I think it’s a powerful subject, but I think the painting is somewhat underdeveloped. It is energetic but maybe lacks colour intensity. I guess I’m realizing it because it is something I recognize in some of my own paintings. For example my pineapple painting is similar in this “lack of intensity”. I think my pineapple is more varied with textures than Karen Dawson’s painting, but it also lacks some depth and intensity.

Random: Works with the colour effect of opaque yellow lines against the flowing effect of watercolours. It has more of the qualities I appreciate in watercolours, in particular colour intensity.

Karen Dawson XXXX Street game     Karen Dawson XXXX Random

Kathy Wariner (United States, contemporary, trained artist)

Kathy Wariner 2013 Daisy and red cloverAgain I found no pure watercolours, instead quite energetic watercolour paintings with linear elements that are probably underdrawings executed with charcoal or graphite. I imagine how the paintings would lack structure without the linear elements. The lines have a double effect – they tame the flowing colours, but they are also energetic  in themselves. I think lines and washes work very well together here.

This is something quite inspirational for my own paintings, because so far, I have made underdrawings in hard pencil and lost track of them as I added layers of watercolour. I might be more courageous with integrating my underdrawings in the final painting.

– Daisy and red clover
– Flowers
– Still life with bananas

Kathy Wariner 2013 Flowers     Kathy Wariner 2013 Still life with bananas

Edith Dora Rey (Swiss/Canadian, contemporary, trained artist)

The two paintings I selected are very similar in colour and composition, but only the second one has some linear elements. It’s nice to see how this changes the overall effect into something more edgy. I admire the simplicity of shapes and the intensity of colours. I’d like to have more of this in my own paintings.

– Gravy jug: Pure watercolour
– Salt shaker: Watercolours with line

Edith Dora Rey 2014 Gravy jug     Edith Dora Rey 2014 Salt shaker

For now, I will leave my research at that, but I’m definitely sensitized to application of mixed media with watercolours. With more time, I guess I’ll come across a broader variety of mixed media works and get a more comprehensive understanding of the effects and differences compared to pure watercolour paintings.

References

Karen Dawson http://www.karendawson.com/mixed.htm and http://arugulayumyum.wordpress.com

Kathy Wariner http://kathywariner.wordpress.com/ and http://www.roundaboutmadison.com/InsidePages/ArchivedArticles/2005/0905HCArstCraftsGuild.html

Edith Dora Rey: http://doreyme.blogs.com/

Using resists experimentally

IMG_1029This was quite an exciting exercise. I think I could use this technique again later on. I still had difficulties finding a single subject to explore, and so tried out different ideas.

I started with abstract experimentation using light and dark green oil pastels and then applied an indigo wash from very light to quite dark values. The oil pastel was used both linearly and as broader textures. I wanted to have a mixture of effects of light over light, light over dark, dark over light and dark over dark tones. I think the result looks interesting (ca. A3 size).

IMG_1038Then I used wax resist for a bouquet of flowers, with an alizarin crimson red first wash on top. Afterwards I applied more washes, more wax, oil pastels and gouache to work out the flowers, and a wash with Payne’s grey to darken the background. (48 x 38 cm)

I proceeded with a self portraits in transparent wax resist on white paper. I destroyed the first one because I had added so much additional media that nothing of the original effects remained and I did not like the result at all. I made two more self portraits in wax and laid light washes over it, but then wasn’t courageous enough to apply additional media. Self portraits seem to have a dark magic to them and I wasn’t ready for further experimentation with abstraction on this subject. (ca A3 size)

IMG_1023      IMG_1032

IMG_1037Instead, I made another attempt with a different subject and chose a pineapple. Again starting with a transparent wax drawing on white paper, then adding light washes in yellow, red and green. Then some linear elements using coloured pencils, and intensifying the yellow and orange tones with oil pastel marks. Finally I added shadows with a watercolour wash. (ca. A3 size)

Guided reflections

Describe your experience of working ‘invisibly’

Working invisibly was very strange at first, because there was hardly any visual control over the  marks placed on the paper. Laying a wash on top revealed surprising results. I left the two self-portraits as they were to remind me of the pure effect. Over the three different subjects (flowers, self portrait, pineapple) I began to feel a little more confident and began to appreciate the looseness of the approach.

What have you learned in this exercise about new approaches?

I think I learned that it takes me some time to tune into a new technique and that changing subjects seem to help exploring a technique’s potential, for example by inspiring me to make different kinds of marks. In particular for the transparent resist approach, I found that it works best with a rather loose style of washes and other media.

Can you see how you could apply what you have learned in future?

Working transparently is a nice way of introducing an element of chance and unpredictability into a watercolour painting. It works very much in contrast to the classical, very analytical approach. I could apply this approach when I want to create paintings that have a more spontaneous and experimental feel to them.

What is your assessment of what you have produced?

I think I’ve made an interesting start into the new technique and I liked how it resulted in quite expressive paintings. This is remarkably different from some of the very controlled and worked out paintings I produced in parts 3 and 4. These experimental paintings also work nicely as mixed media images, because the additional media take up a more prominent role without overpowering the watercolour effects.

Mixed media on coloured and white paper

This was another exercise I found quite hard. The most difficult part of it was to settle on a subject. I’m not overly happy with my final choice, but decided I simply had to get going even if it wasn’t the perfect subject for continued work on a longer series of paintings.

I briefly reconsidered the cats as subject but scared away from the difficulties, and instead decided to try some terrace views.

Terrace views

What I found interesting were all the potted plants and their “unorderly appearance”. My terrace is kind of a refuge because I can be outside, but feel safe and at home. I also thought it would be helpful to be close to my art materials for all the experimentation expected for the exercise.

IMG_0997In the first view, I particularly liked the shadows of the plants and pots. I started with a pencil drawing, which I colourized with dry pastels using my finger to smudge pigment on the paper. Then I dissolved the pigments and laid washes with watercolours.

The second view was made on blue ground. I started with watercolours and added some white gouache, but the only additional media I managed to employ was black felt pen for the handrails on the roof of the building opposite the terrace. I was so busy painting all the details of the scene that I wasn’t open for any experimentation.

The third view was made on rose ground and again I started with a pencil underdrawing, then added white gouache for highlights and laid darker washes for the pots and stuff. Same problem of not wanting to spoil the image with additional media… At this point I decided to abandon the subject for now.

IMG_1000      IMG_1001

Painting a bouquet of flowers

IMG_1003I had made a first quick tryout painting of the bouquet after the second small terrace study because I felt I didn’t get going with additional media. Part of the problem was the small size – I wasn’t comfortable with using bold media like oil pastels on a small surface for small elements. I thought I might get along better using a larger format, and that a colourful flower bouquet would help me to work a little more experimental.

Choosing a setting was the next problem because my study is small and there’s not much space for nice arrangements. I resigned to using two brown cardboards as background and placed the vase on the floor. I chose oil pastels for the flowerheads and watercolour washes for stems and leaves, the vase and the background. (Format: 38 x 28 cm on white ground)

I wasn’t very satisfied because I found the format still too small and was unsure about the quality of the painting, but at least I seemed to be able to integrate other media, so I decided to continue with the bouquet.

Flower bouquet: Four small studies (A4 watercolour sketchbook)

Study 1: White ground, grey felt pen and watercolours
Study 2: Ice blue ground, purple felt pen, white and coloured gouache, watercolours
Study 3: Brown ground, coloured pencil, gouache and watercolours
Study 4: White ground, coloured inks, watercolours, crayons

In studies 1 to 3 there’s a zooming in effect which was my response to finding the A4 format too small for the large bouquet. I thought focusing on a smaller part of the bouquet would help me capture the shapes, colours and textures better. The fourth one was back to including the entire bouquet and trying a dark background to bring out the colours more intensely. I made a real effort in overcoming my reluctance to use additional media and felt like being pushed out of my comfort zone.

IMG_1006       IMG_1008

IMG_1009      IMG_1012

Two larger paintings

The fourth small study was based on a slightly altered arrangement of the flowers, and I found this composition worked better. I also liked the dark background. So I chose that one for the larger study on coloured ground. I did not want to revert to the earlier flower arrangement, so stayed with that one for the second larger study as well.

Large study 1 (48 x 34 cm): Light blue ground, started with ink pen (non-waterproof), added white and yellow gouache, watercolours, crayons and oil pastels.

I was surprised that the ink pen wasn’t waterproof and bleeded into the gouache layer. But gradually adapting to experimental mode, I wanted to continue and see how the painting would develop. I applied oil pastels over the coloured areas to protect the colours before the final wash, but the blue undertone changed the bright yellows into a green tone which was not quite what I wanted. Nevertheless I think this painting looks quite interesting due to the bleeding of the ink. I also like the visible brush strokes in the flowers, they are energetic and make for a lively effect.

Large study 2 (48 x 34 cm): White ground, started with watercolours wet in wet, added pen & ink, crayons and watercolour. Used masking fluid and transparent wax as resists before applying a final wash in Payne’s grey.

The second study is somewhat more considerate. I used a wet in wet technique on white ground to obtain intensely coloured areas with undefined edges, and then added definition for flowers and stems with pen and ink. The technique was less energetic and the result is quite different in style from the first study, a little more delicate and subtle. The transparent wax worked well to protect the colours.

IMG_1014

 

IMG_1016

Guided reflections

The effect of coloured paper

I had already begun using coloured in the previous exercise and did so because I wanted an even background without brush marks. It had the effect of toning down all colours, which could be counterbalanced by using white gouache or intensified by employing even darker tones, or tilted by adding coloured layers for unusual mixes.

In the terrace views, I was not very happy with the colour changing effect of the blue and red grounds and found it added an awkward tone to the entire painting. I think the effect remained awkward throughout the bouquet paintings as well. The ice blue background tilted the yellows into green and mudded the red tones, and the brown background mudded the entire painting. Of course it is possible to make extended use of white gouache to neutralize this before adding more colours, and maybe it would have been the best solution. That would make it possible to have the best of both worlds: A smooth, dark background plus clean bright colours on top.

On the other hand, there’s also a certain charm and interest in the chance effects that can result from the coloured ground. The mixed media approach gives more options to work with the effects and change the painting in ways that would’t be possible with watercolours alone.

In this exercise what was the initial effect of working on a coloured ground as opposed to white?

The initial effect was clearly a darkening of the entire painting and change of any colour applied subsequently on the coloured ground.

Are either studies more successful than the other?

I think the first and the fourth small studies are better than the second and third because the colours are more natural and there’s more fluidity in approach. I also prefer the second large study over the first. In all cases, these are the ones on white background. I think it’s because of the strange change in colours resulting from the coloured ground that I prefer the white background.

Maybe this depends on the subject of the painting. I imagine that a dark and mysterious scene would benefit from a coloured ground.

Do any of your pictures show a strong sense of abstract composition? If so, which ones?

I think the first large study is the most abstract one. I think it’s because it has the least detail and the emphasis is on coloured areas. The energy of the brush strokes is more important than the similarity with the actual flowers. It’s also the painting with the least definition of details in the flowers.

Do you think any of your paintings or studies could be looked at primarily for their abstract qualities?

Probably again the first larger study, but maybe also the second. In the second I particularly like the underlying watercolour wet in wet effect. There were moments where I regretted to add ink lines into the colour clouds.

How could you develop greater abstraction in your work?

Choosing the right format may play a role. I have already observed that working on small scale has helped me to let go of detail when working with watercolours alone. Maybe it’s even in general helpful to choose a bold medium in relation to the format available that will promote a more generous approach. But I must admit that I felt quite uncomfortable with the idea of using bold oil pastel sticks in the terrace views, it just did not seem to work.

Interestingly, this time the larger format seemed to have helped me to work more generously. Maybe this was because I knew I couldn’t maintain a detail approach on that format. So maybe the mindset and intention for a painting are just as important.

The instruction to work quickly has also helped this time. I remember well that I often have my problems with time restrictions, because I want to study an object first and “it takes as long as it takes”. But this time at least in the two larger paintings, the time restriction felt beneficial to focus on the essentials and work more generously over the entire surface.

Research point: Examples of mixed media pictures

Look for other examples of mixed media pictures such as Henry Moore’s Pink and Green Sleepers (page 23) which uses wax resist, and John Marin’s The Singer Building (page 145) which uses pencil and charcoal.

Henry Moore 1941 Pink and green sleepers

Pink and Green Sleepers 1941 by Henry Moore OM, CH 1898-1986I came across the series of drawings by Henry Moore (English, 1898 – 1986) to which this drawing belongs during the drawing course. The scenes depict people in the shelters during World War II bombings. This drawing was made using graphite, ink, gouache and wax on paper. It is very sombre in atmosphere and captures the Angst of the times. But there’s also a sense of comfort in seeing the two people in company and protected.

Technically, the watercolours are very pale and stand back, the painting is dominated by the tonality and the textured surfaces created through scratching.

Tate Britain http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/moore-pink-and-green-sleepers-n05713

John Marin 1921 The Singer Building

John Marin 1921 The Singer Building

This painting by John Marin (American, 1870 – 1953) dates from the early Twenties of the 20th century and depicts a building in New York. It is very energetic and loose. The media were watercolour, charcoal, and black conté crayon on wove paper. Interesting is how these elements fall apart and seem to explode with energy. In the same way, the drawing is not tight and accurate, but fragmented and sketchy.

Philadelphia Museum of Art http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/permanent/50636.html

Having looked at the two suggested mixed media works, I was slightly unsure how to continue this research, because “mixed media” is a wide field and I did not know which artists to look at. I wanted to avoid getting back to my usual suspects and therefore did a Google search on the keywords “Mixed media” and “Mixed media painting”. One of the first hits was the website of Kellie Day, a contemporary mixed media artist. I was enchanted and surprised by this chance find as her style is very close to my understanding of mixed media today.

Kellie Day, a contemporary American mixed media artist

I’m including the first paintings I saw as a reminder, because they attracted me to stay on the website and look further into this artist’s work. I find her paintings light, colourful, energetic and very friendly.

Kellie Day XXXX Bike Diptych      Kellie Day XXXX Vino Blanco

Kellie Day XXXX Holy war (female nude)      Kellie Day XXX The sun never says (mountains)

There’s a short video “Peek into my studio” where she presents herself and her methods. She considers herself a mixed media artist and works in various techniques on canvas: Drawing, painting and collage, using multiple transparent and opaque layers of paint and ink. Kellie Day is a trained artist with a background in fine arts and illustration. She works from photos which are displayed on a wide-screen laptop that is placed next to a huge, high working table. This is quite similar to my setting when I work from photos, except that my studio space is tiny, compared to hers, with a much smaller and lower table. What I particularly liked was seeing that she works standing, not sitting at her desk! This confirmed my idea that standing is better when making art, because it is somehow liberating, it permits broader arm movements and helps to let go of fiddling with details.

Then, big surprise, there was actually a painting of sunflowers among her works! It is really beautiful and much lighter than my sunflower paintings so far. It’s a bit like my pencil sunflower sketch translated into paint.

Kellie Day XXXX Your Sweet Ass (Sunflowers)

Pablo Picasso, from the Guitar series (Moma Exhibition)

There were no more interesting hits in that search, so I went back to Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881 – 1973) because I remembered that he employed and combined many different media and was very inventive. My Google search turned up a link to an exhibition at the Moma New York in 2011, showing a series of increasingly abstract works around the topic of a guitar.

The works mostly combine drawing, collage and paint on canvas. Although no watercolour was used, I think they are inspiring even 100 years after they have been made. I see the beginnings of cubism in them and I like the composition/decomposition aspect of playing with partly recognizable shapes, adding colour and tone. They also have an element of openness and “breathing space” which my own drawings, paintings and prints often lack.

Picasso 1913 Guitar, Gas Jet, and bottle    Pablo Picasso 1913 Head of a man
Guitar, Glas Jet, and bottle (1913): Oil, charcoal, tinted varnish, and grit on canvas
Head of a man (1913): Cut-and-pasted wallpaper, newspaper and paper, charcoal, ink and pencil on paper mounted on canvas

Moma exhibition website: http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2011/picassoguitars//index.php

Further Google search on mixed media did not turn up many interesting other hits so I decided to look into a more serious resource, the Oxford Art Libary and searched for mixed media there. This did not turn up any paintings so I searched for watercolours and from the result list, I selected those which looked like employing watercolours with additional media. One of the first results was a painting by Paul Klee

Paul Klee 1921 Tale à la Hoffman

Paul Klee 1921 Tale a la HoffmannThis painting by Paul Klee (German/Swiss 1879 – 1940) was made using watercolours, pencil and transferred ink on paper. I found this very interesting because I know the technique from the printmaking course. It’s called “Backdrawing” or “Transfer drawing” and is achieved by placing the image on an inked surface and drawing lines on the backside. When the paper is pulled off the inked surface, the lines drawn appear on the face side of the paper, because the ink has transferred due to the drawing pressure. I now recognize that Klee must have used the technique in many of his paintings. The overall impression of this painting is very unique, very characteristic for Klee and very different from any other watercolour artist I’ve seen before.

John Lewis Krimmel c. 1813 Merrymaking at a wayside inn

John Lewis Krimmel ca 1813 Merrymaking at a wayside inn2This picture by John Lewis Krimmel (American/German born 1786-1821) combined watercolour and graphite on white laid paper. To me it is very characteristic for the classical 19th century watercolour illustrative drawing style. Watercolours serve to colorize a drawing, the graphite helps to achieve tonal differences. The graphite does not stand out on its own as separate medium, but serves to give structure to the image.

My approach of using additional media was similar in intention, although my style with watercolours was different.

Honoré Daumier c. 1860-65 The connaisseur

Honoré Daumier ca 1865 The ConnaisseurThis drawing by Honoré Daumier (French, 1808-1879) is similar to that by Krimmel in its subtle combination of watercolour with other media. It used pen and ink, wash, watercolour, lithographic crayon on wove paper.

Concluding remarks

This was quite an interesting research point, although there’s the problem that once started, I could go on and on without any hope of ever covering the field in its entirety, because there’s so much art out there. But I think this brief starter covered several different approaches:

– The illustrative style where watercolour serves as a coloring medium for a drawing. This style was present in the two 19th century works by Krimmel and Daumier, but I’ve also seen it in contemporary illustrations, for example in children’s books
–  A dynamic, loose and sketchy drawing approach like the work of John Marin.
–  More painterly approaches like that employed by Kellie Day
–  Abstract, graphical approaches similar to works by Picasso and Klee

Again I’m rethinking my choice of subject, whether to stay with the sunflowers or to switch to the cats (or even doing something completely different next time). Due to the near impossible of making detailed drawings or paintings of the cats without resigning to photos, the subject might actually help me to let go of accurate depiction and become more adventurous in approach.

On the other hand, the sunflower painting by Kellie Day is like a proof that the mindset is important, not the characteristics of the subject. I’m not sure. Maybe just give it another try with the cats and see what happens. I think my series of sunflowers somehow calls for a change of subject.

 

 

 

Exploring one subject in a variety of media

The exercise went very differently from what I had expected. I started with my cats as subjects because I had been enjoying painting animals and thought the cats were “convenient” because they’re always there and I don’t have to travel to a zoo, make up with the weather, or wait for the week-end because I can’t go to places during the week.

Deciding on a subject

I knew the subject was challenging and that so far I hadn’t been able to make more advanced drawings of my cats, because they’re moving constantly and I was drawing not fast enough. But I thought that doing a whole series on them would help to improve my skills. So I set out to make some drawings to see how far I’d get.

IMG_0939     IMG_0940

IMG_0942     IMG_0944     IMG_0947

Although I liked these sketches, I found drawing the cats extremely difficult and I was very unsure whether they were appropriate for the task. For example, I couldn’t count on being able to draw the same cat in the same position twice or even several times, so the idea of comparing the effect of different media choices on a single composition would be compromised. The effectiveness of the painting would mostly depend on being lucky enough to depict enough before the moment was gone. I could draw the cats either very quick and sketchy because of their constant motion – or depict them sleeping which isn’t very interesting. Overall, I found the cats were too complex as subject for now and decided to switch to a different, unmoving subject: Sunflowers.

Sunflowers

I made studies of a single flower and a drawing of five flowers in their vase, plus a pastel sketch to try out a background arrangement. The pencil drawing of the bouquet was a novel approach. I stayed quite sketchy and tried to “feel the marks”: The softer flowerheads with softer marks and lighter tones against the more scratchy marks of the harder green leaves surrounding them.

What fascinated me were the irregular contours of the yellow flower leaves – as opposed to the “ideal” generic sunflower in my mind/memory which has perfectly even shapes.

IMG_0949     IMG_0951     IMG_0953     IMG_0955

Paintings using additional media

The main problem with mixing media was that I didn’t feel ready for it. The feeling of lacking basic watercolour skills which troubled me during the tinted paper project, continued to bother me. What I wanted was painting with watercolours and trying to get better with that medium – not messing around with additional media that would even exacerbate my difficulties with watercolours themselves.

At the same time, I was surprised by my inner resistance because in principle, I was very interested in experimenting with a variety of materials and techniques. I think the series reflects my reluctance to introduce additional media. I tried hard to integrate them into the painting so they would not dominate the result. I wanted the paintings to be watercolours, not oil pastel drawings or anything else. It felt like I couldn’t let go and was unwilling to do anything more experimental.

There was also a feeling of half-heartedness related to the course brief’s suggestions of using oil pastels, charcoal, and crayons with watercolours. For my chosen subject, I saw only very limited choices for employing these. Maybe charcoal for linear elements (could have used pen & ink to a similar effect), and oil pastels or crayons either for more intense colours or as resists, or both. I tried oil pastels for the background but scraped them off because they were overpowering the flowerheads. I even dissolved them further with mineral spirit on the paper to erase the spotty leftovers and make the background less busy.

IMG_0958     IMG_0960     IMG_0961     IMG_0964

Sunflowers v1 (5 flowers): Watercolours and coloured pencil, 33 x 43 cm. Just traces of coloured pencil in the yellow areas of the flowerheads.

Sunflowers v2 (3 flowers): Watercolours and partly dissolved oil pastel, 35.5 x 33 cm. Oil pastels for the yellows and the dark hearts. Dissolved oil pastel layer in the right background

Sunflowers v3 (wet on wet): Watercolours and charcoal, 33 x 43 cm. The charcoal was used as a linear element to give more structure where the different colours run into each other.

Sunflowers v4 (brown background): Watercolours and oil pastel, 28 x 35.5 cm. Oil pastels are used for the yellow in the flowerheads and for the texture of the dark brown hearts.

Colorized monotype

A step forward was the idea to combine watercolours with monotype. I liked the idea because it felt more like a true mixed media approach. I used a 30 x 40 cm perspex plate and Akua Intaglio inks. I employed a subtractive technique, wiping off ink using cloth (tarlatan), Q-tips, corrugated cardboard, foam pvc, and a spatula. The resulting print was in grey tones, made on firm, bright white printmaking paper. I then colourized the print using watercolours.

IMG_0934     IMG_0936     IMG_0965
Sunflowers in a vase v5 (colorized), watercolours on b/w monoprint, 28 x 35.5 cm

Using a background wash

Another attempt at using additional media with watercolours was by preparing a coloured wash. The guiding idea was to work with a strong colour contrast and bring out the characteristic silhouette of the flowerheads. I chose a medium tone indigo background wash. The flowerhead contours were then drawn with felt pen, the yellow areas received an underpainting with white acrylics, then a layer of yellow watercolours with traces of cadmium red. Finally they were worked over with yellow oil pastels to intensify the colours.

To add more interest, I structured the background into an interior view, and included the entire glass vase. I added tone using white gouache for lights and Payne’s Grey for darker tones, with some yellow and red for the stuff on the drawers.

The painting incorporates what I reflected upon in the “lightbulb moments” post: I used the pale, dark background to bring out the orange-yellow of the flowers, and emphasized the silhouettes to capture the characteristics of my flowers. It’s not what I’d consider a true mixed media approach, because the additional media (felt pen, white acrylics, oil pastels) are deeply integrated and support the painting, but the overall effect remained that of a watercolour painting.

Maybe it’s as far as I can get with “mixed media” for now. It felt strange that by shifting the focus to other media, I develop more skills at conventional watercolour painting, and also the handling of tinted paper with watercolours seems to improve with a time lag – in this exercise rather than in the actual earlier project. Maybe some more experimental ideas will come along over the course of this project, or even later.

IMG_0967
Sunflowers in a vase v6 (interior view), watercolour with felt pen, acrylics and oil pastels, 43 x 33 cm

Guided reflections

Which of your studies works best and why?

I’m hesitating between the colourized monoprint and the interior view with blue background. The monoprint works nicely because the grey textured background adds interest, and because it’s “painted” in an energetic and loose style. The yellows also look nice and warm.

By contrast, the interior view is a much more controlled and “exact” painting. I think it is technically quite good, for example how I depicted the glass vase with water, reflections and transparency. The sunflowers’ heads are defined, but irregular. Their yellow stands out really strong.

Adding the background was informed by a still life I recently saw somewhere on the internet and made me realize that my backgrounds were flat. So I wanted to give more depth to the entire painting. The painting I saw used only lighter and darker tones to create a sense of space around the arrangement. I took a different route and painted the actual view, but due to the muted colours it recedes sufficiently.

On what basis did you choose your various combinations of media?

My central idea was to use additional media to complement and support the watercolour painting. I did not want them to turn the picture into something different or to stand out as separate elements. I think I succeeded with this, but I’m aware that there’s much more to the concept of mixed media than just using a few charcoal lines to “save” a wet on wet watercolour painting. I’d be particularly interested in using materials with a haptic effect, like acrylics with various stuff added, or using different materials for collage.

I did not venture into this because I thought about the difficulties it would pose at assessment time, if I’d have to submit works not made on paper but on sturdier supports like thick cardboard or wood. So overall, I think I made interesting paintings but I’m a bit disappointed about my rather restricted use of other media.

Are there any effects that have especially pleased or surprised you?

I liked the effect of using coloured oil pastels together with watercolours in the yellow flowers. I chose slightly different yellow tones, which created an interesting texture effect. Similarly, the dark brown oil pastel layer in the flower’s hearts worked well to depict the somewhat grainy texture of that surface.

Which combinations of media will you want to use again?

I might get back to oil pastels. But overall I’m not very fond of adding other media to watercolours. Nevertheless, I think that I could use watercolours together with other media in a more liberal fashion. I’m only a little blank-headed right now how that might be.

In what way did this exercises succeed or otherwise?

The exercise was difficult because I did not feel like using additional media in my paintings. It was basically a struggle to overcome my resistance and then trying to control the effect. I guess this situation is responsible for the somewhat uncreative use of additional media. So from the aspect of “inventive use of a combination of media”, the exercise was only moderately successful. I’m still quite happy with the actual paintings I made, because I feel my use of watercolours is improving.

How have you found exploring this subject in different ways?

It was a challenge to remain motivated enough to draw and paint the same flowers many times. I introduced some variation like a slightly different viewpoint or adding the interior view in the final one. I was also alternating between a more loose and sketchy approach and my fascination with the irregular shapes which I wanted to study closely and depict accurately as they actually were. My interest was on the ways how I approached the subject and created an interesting painting. The mixed media aspect was rather distracting from what I considered the main task.

I think I’d have preferred the exercise without the mixed media requirement. Maybe I need much more watercolour practice to arrive at a point where additional media represent a welcome addition and expansion of possibilities. Or maybe it’s a matter of taste – I simply prefer ‘pure watercolours’ and have objections even against using white gouache for highlights.

Can you see further directions in exploring this subject?

Definitely yes. At times I thought “God invented sunflowers so that they can be painted”. I fell in love with the yellow-orange colours and how they look like flames. Further directions would be to find the right context for a bouquet of sunflowers. I’d prefer something more timeless than my interior view.

On the other hand, looking at my cat sketches from the beginning of the exercise, I realize that the cats would present me with much more variety by themselves. Compared to that, sunflowers are sunflowers and basically look always the same. I might change their colours, then they become surrealistic. I might change the background, this would create different colour contrasts and also different context interpretations. The interesting stuff might come when I “push the limits” to introduce all kinds of unexpected things. Maybe a different perspective, sizing up or down, colour effects, media effects.

From a practical point of view, they work well with the course requirements because I can paint at home and from life. I just have to regularly replace them when they’re wilted. Or maybe, continue with wilted sunflowers.

If I’d have stayed with the cats, there would have been certainly more variety in compositions and even using the same media combinations, the paintings would vary greatly.