Category Archives: Part V

Some sources of inspiration

About a year ago, I started using my Facebook page as a “visual diary” of interesting artwork I come across online. The idea was to have a reminder for later research on particular artists or other topics related to art.

What I tagged were mostly paintings, many rooted in the classical traditions but also abstract paintings. One very interesting Facegroup page I follow is “I Require Art” (https://www.facebook.com/IRequireArt?ref=profile). Over the last couple of months, they brought up several less known works by artist like Van Gogh or Picasso, but also pointed me to artists I had never heard of, both from the U.S. and other parts of the world, contemporary, “modern” and traditional.

Anselm Kiefer 1981 Margarete

Recently I tagged the painting “Margarete” (1981) by Anselm Kiefer (German, born 1945), because I wanted to keep track of it for Part 5 of this course, as an inspiration for mixed media approaches. It is an oil painting which includes bundles of straw. The painting’s subject is embedded in Kiefer’s engagement with German History and the Nazi era. Margarete refers to a personnage in Paul Celan’s poem “Death Fugue”. Much symbolism can be read in the intertwining of straw and oil colour. I’m particularly interested in the haptic qualities of that painting and the use of unusual materials. I guess I’m going to do more research on Kiefer.

Anselm Kiefer 1981 Margarete

Sue Hubbard on Anselm Kiefer’s work and the relationship to Paul Celan’s poem: http://suehubbard.com/index.php?mact=News,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=109&cntnt01returnid=57

Brian Eskill 2014 Road close to home

A second important source of inspiration is the Facebook Group “En Plein Air Paintings”, where contemporary professional and amateur artists post their recent paintings. The group has around 11000 members mostly in the U.S., but also in other contries, with often 20 or more postings per day. The submissions cover a broad range of styles and are very interesting to follow. I haven’t posted there yet because I consider my attempts too weak to present them to a broader audience. But the value of the group for me is in seeing so many different styles and approaches, and I learn from looking at the paintings and how others solved problems I encountered myself.

Today there was a painting I found particularly interesting and very successful. It is by Brian Eskill, his first posting to the group. I think he’s relatively young and completely unknown as an artist, maybe an art student. But the painting impressed me because it is such a successful translation of an apparently uninteresting suburb road into a painting that’s pleasant to look at, with a great composition and harmonious choice of colours.

I appreciate how the artist has simplified the shapes of houses, cars and trees, and how he suggests rather than explicitly painting everything he sees. The painting style reminds me a bit of Edward Hopper but is livelier because it retains the “rough edges” where Hopper smoothed and cleaned. I’m totally impressed and think this is the way I’d like to go as well, apart from suspecting this artist will make his way. The style is not directly transferable to watercolours, but the approach would work for me similarly: Reduction of details, retaining the essentials, and keeping it light and lively.

Brian Eskill 2014 Road before the houseBrian Eskill 2014 Road before the house - Photo

Brian Eskill 2014 Road before the house
Posted to the Facebook group “En Plein Air” Paintings
https://www.facebook.com/groups/104484319588591/?fref=nf

Painting a landscape on coloured paper

I started this task based on the two landscape sketches I made recently while in Crestwood, a little town close to New York. It is a view over a water basin of the Bronx river which I painted while sitting on a huge fallen tree. A large branch of the tree formed an arc over the water, and there was a complex visual pattern of dark branches and their reflexions on the water.

On the spot I first made a watercolour sketch of the scene (A4) and then a pencil drawing of the tree in my brown square sketchbook (21 x 22 cm), and also took some pictures for later reference. I chose one of them for this exercise on coloured grounds.

IMG_0921   IMG_0869

I started with another watercolour sketch on white paper and then made a tonal study in grey pastels to help me sorting out colours, the lighter and darker tones and also the various textured areas.

IMG_0923     IMG_0926

Then I made two paintings on coloured ground. The first was on green, the second on light brown wash in the same A4 watercolour sketchbook. I employed some white gouache for the lightest areas and switched to a flat brush for the trees in the second painting.

IMG_0927      IMG_0930

While painting, I had some trouble with my choice of subject, because I found it too loaded with details and lacking an open view. I found it difficult to paint smaller elements or the narrow, lengthy shapes of reflecting areas on the water. These areas are not very recognizable in the paintings. I think the depiction of foliage, reflection, tree in the foreground become better over the paintings of the series. If I were to do it again, I think I’d choose a more open view and reduce the amount of details included in the painting.

Guided reflections

Which is the most successful landscape study and why?

I think the final one is the most successful, because this is where I achieved a more skillful depiction of the elements in the view, and also because the background colour (brown) blends into the painting without looking strange.

Is the atmoshpere different in any of the pictures? If so, say why you think this is.

Yes, I think the painting on the green paper has a bit of twilight appeal, while the final (on brown) looks bit sad. The most friendly atmosphere is probably in the paintings on white ground, because the colours look brightest.

What problems did the tinted papers present?

The tinted papers changed the colour hues and toned down the entire scene. One of the challenges was to brighten this up a bit and not produce a very dark painting, or an effect of all mudded colours. I think the painting on green paper looks quite artificial, probably because of the blueish green I used. The brown paper blended more naturally with the colours I added on top.

Were there ways in which the tinted papers helped you to find your landscape colours more easily?

Maybe I did not choose the best subject for this exercise, because my landscape was so dominated by green tones and there were not many other colours. I don’t think the tinted colours were particularly helpful for my colour choices.

How important to your paintings were the gouache and/or oil pastels?

I used less gouache than in the earlier two subjects (shoes and still life), and no oil pastels. I found my background colours relatively light so less need to brighten up larger areas with gouache. Maybe I could have included more light in the foliage of the trees on the opposite side of the water basin. It did not occur to me to use oil pastels here. Maybe they’d have worked for the non-reflective areas on the water surface.

Can you see how you might exploit some of these approaches in the future?

I did not feel very comfortable with the tinted grounds nor with the additional media. Difficulties with watercolour medium and the composition were too dominant. If I were to do it again, I’d prefer working on a larger scale and I’d choose a different composition with a more open view.

My aim for this course was to learn painting with watercolours and currently I don’t feel that my skills are very good. I feel I’d still have to do simple paintings to become better with the medium, before switching to experimental stuff. I enjoy experimenting but at this point I feel it’s a distraction from what I set out to learn. Maybe for me it would be better to take some time off and simply paint with watercolours, then come back to the experimental approaches. As this is not possible time-wise, I’ll see where this gets me. Currently my attempts with tinted papers and other media feel a bit half-hearted.

More Artists: Naiza Khan

Looking at this artist, I’m following up a suggestion by my tutor. I first looked at the recommended “Shifting Ground” series (from 2011) and liked it. I don’t include any pictures here because their download was blocked. Most paintings in this series consist of large watercolour blotches that are combined with very fine line drawings of buildings or other constructed elements. The buildings were small in size, compared to the watercolour blotches, and this creates a very interesting shift in perspective. I also like how this brings out the characteristic flowing effects of watercolours.

I find Naiza Khan’s work is interesting and unusual. In this series I like how watercolour as medium has been given room to speak for itself, the chance effects of pigments flowing in water onto the paper support. This is something I’d like to develop in my own work as well.

From skim reading, I understood that Naiza Khan’s biography of living in a politically unstable country has found its way into her artwork. On a second go, I went though the complete gallery of works and was quite impressed. The Ruskin Drawings (1987-90) from her time as an art student convey the imagery of being haunted – by nightmares or bad memories maybe. They are visually very appealing, with much energy and intense contrasts.

The series of works over her career are on varied topics, very sensual and in parts quite explicit. Not the kind of stuff I’d want to make but I appreciate that her themes follow ‘personal obsessions’, which is what I still have to discover for my own practice.

I also like the “emptyness” of some of the works. There’s open space and few marks that create larger entities. By contrast, my drawings and paintings tend to be “cluttered”, there’s too much squeezed into them. Another aspect I’d like to improve in my works.

Overall, quite an interesting excursion into the world of a modern artist. By personal preference, I’m more into traditional painting and would rather research classical artists. But looking at contemporary artists with non-traditional approaches is interesting nevertheless.

References

http://www.naizakhan.com/

 

Drawing on a coloured ground

IMG_0900I got back to my two onions and combined them with a spice mug and a pitcher, placed this on a black table and used a yellow towel for the background. Then I made a drawing in the sketchbook to test the composition and look at the tonal values. I wasn’t overly happy with the arrangement but thought it would work for the task.

The paintings did not turn out very well. I found the instructions confusing in that they did not make clear what the focus of the task was – colour temperature, tonal values, or combining drawing media with watercolours. Correspondingly, making the two paintings felt like muddling around without knowing on what to concentrate. I used Scarlet Red for the warm colour ground, and Indigo blue for the cold colour ground.

The main difficulty I had was that painting on these grounds felt like “fighting against” the background colour, rather than working with it. The scarlet red went totally Kitsch when I applied white gouache for the highligts. In the remaining time, I tried to “cool down” the overall effect of the intense red background. I added white to the background to prepare the yellow overlayer, which became a psychedelic orange tone in stark contrast to the blue-violet of the pitcher. By contrast, the Indigo in the second painting caused all colours I subsequently applied to look very weird and unhealthy, and I remember that I tried to “warm it all up”. The colours of the spice mug are quite good though.

IMG_0903     IMG_0909

I’m not satisfied with my watercolour technique in these two paintings. It felt like a step back into fiddling with detail and not applying enough water, so there’s no flow in the colours. I used coloured pencil in the first one to intensify the blue of the pitcher. In the actual painting the pitcher has a stronger violet tone, not the blue of the photo.

In the second one, I used yellow oil pastel to intensify the background colour.

Overall, I did not particularly like the effect of these coloured grounds. It may be due to the particular colours I chose, maybe they were too dominant. The background colours in the previous exercise worked much better for me.

There is indeed a difference in colour temperature of both paintings, the first has a much warmer overall effect than the second. But I wasn’t able to use this effect to bring elements to the fore or send them to the back. Maybe this has to do with the still life subject because the viewer knows that all elements are approximately at the same distance, so the distance effect of colour temperature does not work. I don’t think the cool versus the warm background convey a different sense of distance here. The distance effect might work better with landscape subjects.

I’m not sure what I’m going to make of this experiment. I don’t particularly like the outcome and feel that I have still so many basic things to learn with watercolour that coloured grounds are not something I would want to include in any painting for now. I do see some potential in creating interesting effects from layering and using opaque light colours over dark tones, like the yellow-orange background in the first painting. But maybe I’ll change my mind. It’s been very often that I did not like something right after completing it, but a few weeks later I was better able to see what might be interesting or valuable in it.

 

Tonal studies made on a coloured ground

 

Tonal sketches: Searching for a subject

IMG_0842    IMG_0845    IMG_0846

In 23 x 30 cm mixed media sketchbook:
– my two work lamps (black fineliner)
– plants at the kitchen window (gray pastels)
– the blue shoes (coloured pastels)

The blue shoes on coloured grounds

I decided on the shoes because they seemed to work as a subject for this exercise.

IMG_0841   IMG_0849

23 x 30 mixed media sketchbook
– line drawing of the shoes (pencil)
– watercolour sketch on white ground to study tonal relationships

IMG_0855    IMG_0857

A4 watercolour sketchbook
– on purple ground, light source to the right
– on blue ground, light source to the left

IMG_0860

Large study on A3 watercolour paper, on orange (burnt sienna) ground

Reflections on my learning

I had been quite skeptical about the idea of using watercolours on coloured grounds. I thought that watercolours need the white paper shining through which gives brightness to all colours. I thought that starting from a medium toned ground, paintings would become quite dark and dull.

But using opaque white paint helped to exploit the full tonal range. The coloured ground changes the colours quite unexpectedly and I found the overall effect quite dramatic. I got along well with the instructions of adding the very obvious dark areas before working on the in-between tones. Compared to the standard rule of working from light to dark, using dark tones early on was more intuitive for me.

The white was not opaque in the two sketchbook paintings, so their purple and blue backgrounds are quite visible. I applied the gouache more thickly in the larger painting, but still there’s an undertone which gives an interesting texture to the whitish background. The background tone holds the painting together, similar to the coloured washes we experimented with in earlier parts of the course.

I was a bit unsure how much to leave of the background colour as medium tone in the painting. I saw the options of adding only lighter and darker tones, versus locating it lighter or darker than the medium tone and adding other tones accordingly. The purple study appears almost monochrome, with the greens resulting in gray to black colours, and no other colour except white for lightening up some areas. The second study became more colourful overall, as I applied a warm brown tone over the blue ground. The blue still shines through in the wardrobe. The third study on burnt sienna ground is quite monochrome again, but in a much warmer tone overall. These effects are all quite unexpected and I guess it takes some practice to make the best use of them.

I’m still a bit skeptical about the technique of using opaque paint with watercolours, because painting like this feels closer to traditional painting with opaque media. It felt more natural, compared to the difficulties I have with using watercolours and working with transparency, but it also felt like avoiding the essence of watercolour painting.

So yes, it definitely expands my possible range of techniques, but I think I still need more skills in “traditional” application of watercolours. Strangely enough, I consider the shoes paintings among the best I’ve made for this course so far. Maybe that was because I was “allowed” to paint the dark elements relatively early, instead of having to work “from light to dark” which is very counter-intuitive for me. Maybe I should depart from that guideline for watercolours on white grounds as well.

As for the subject, yes I think the shoes were appropriate for the exercise, but I had some trouble keeping up interest. Finding a subject was hard. I would have preferred a still life arrangement with fruits or vegetables, but found that too difficult. I also considered an interior view but didn’t find one I liked for this exercise. The shoes worked well because I could arrange the light source in a consistent manner over several days where I worked on the exercise. The shapes were well defined and there were strong shadows. The problem was my feeling of “this is an irrelevant subject which I’m doing only to fulfil the task requirements”. It’s a recurring problem and I hope to gradually get better at finding more interesting subjects. So yes, it was technically appropriate, but  personally not sufficiently engaging.

The onions

IMG_0851 IMG_0864 IMG_0853While working on the shoes, I considered these two red onions as an alternative subject for studies on coloured grounds. I made an initial watercolour sketch, then a drawing to study the details more closely, and another watercolour sketch.

Although there were interesting tonal fields in the arrangements, I found the onions too complicated for now. I liked the monochrome red-brown tones of the arrangement but thought something more colourful would work better.

On the one hand, I think the watercolour sketches are weak because they are not very accurate in the details, but on the other, I like how they are painted and there’s some charm in the looseness of application. The second one is slightly overworked in the shadows, but works better in the onions’ details.

I also like the pencil drawing and that I used smudging to create soft tones, which is a new technique for me.

It’s all very imperfect but I appreciate the tiny steps of progress I make in handling watercolours and also in drawing skills. Maybe I get back to the onions with a later exercise on coloured grounds.

Fallen tree and other sketches

I recently started a new sketchbook to take with me every day. It’s a small square format of 21 x 22 cm in brown rough paper. I chose this book because the brown paper helps me to tackle one of my weaknesses, which is making marks that are too faint, resulting in drawings that have only a very limited tonal range. The dark paper makes that problem even more visible and  pushes me to make darker marks with more contrasts. I observed the effect in the sketchbook I use for printmaking, so I thought it would be a good idea to keep at it with the watercolour course as well.

IMG_0866  IMG_0867

Brown square 21 x 22 cm sketchbook
– At the bus stop (black biro): I started looking from the outside, with the bus front and the bus stop signpost, then continued inside the bus with the view out of the window and the man sitting opposite me. The contrasts are still too faint, but I like the combination of different views in a single drawing. I realised from the tonal grounds exercise that I can add lighter colours here as well to broaden the tonal range.
– Large tree, bushes and a rock in central park (black fineliner and coloured pencils): I used the opaque white pencil to lighten up the rock. The black fineliner did not work well for making larger areas of deep black tone. I still have difficulties drawing greenery.

IMG_0858   IMG_0869

Sketches made during an excursion to Crestwood, NY
– A4 watercolour sketchbook: A view on a water basin of the Bronx river, sitting on a fallen tree. The tree’s branches stretch out and divide the view.
– Square brown sketchbook: The fallen tree only, using Jet Black pencil. Some improvements in mark making, still needs more contrast.

I took several photos of the location and might get back to that subject later on.

IMG_0872

A4 pencil sketch: View from the end of the Railroad Trail in Tarrytown, NY. I’m finding landscapes very difficult to draw. This is another subject I might take up again later and use the photos I made on location as additional sources.

 

 

More artists: Sigmar Polke

Today I went to the Sigmar Polke exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA). I had high expectations because Polke (1941 – 2010) was introduced as a highly experimental and influential German modern artist. I thought the exhibition might be a nice starter at the beginning of part 5 and provide some inspiration.

I’m probably repeating myself by stating that I’m generally not very much into modern art because it’s too conceptual for my taste. But I went to the Mike Kelley exhibition recently, following a recommendation by my sister and was really impressed. I wrote about the visit in my drawing 1 blog (http://www.patricia-karsten.de/wp-drawing1/wordpress/?p=2922). That visit slightly changed my attitude so I was a bit more willing to have a closer look at another modern artist.

But what I saw in the Polke retrospective just didn’t appeal to me visually. For me, it was a collection of strange ideas, presented as works of art. Some political content, some sexual content, expression of protest against ‘the establishment’. I’m quite critical of society myself but wasn’t able to relate to Polke’s works.

Sigmar Polke 1986 Police Pig     Sigmar Polke 1963 Socks

From the visit I realized that I’m interested in different things, not so much into making visual jokes. A politically or socially critical message is not detrimental but I think I just have a different taste. I’m back to my base line attitude, similar to explaining why I don’t like capres. I just don’t like the taste. But I can absolutely respect people who find them delicious. It makes no sense to argue whether they taste good or bad.

Resources

MOMA exhibition website: http://www.moma.org/visit/calendar/exhibitions/1407
Exhibition review: http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/node/1911649/print